After a long hiatus in between, i finally completed the book “India After Gandhi – History of world’s largest democracy” written by Ramachandra Guha, volumnous enough to cover more than 700 pages.
If in one sentence i have to summarize the book, I would say that it is story of India under nehru gandhi family.
The book beginning coincides with Indian independence making Nehru the premier of the nation and the story is wrapped up at the defeat of Rajiv Gandhi in 1989 and emergence of V.P.Singh as the PM with great expectations. In between though there had been reigns of non-family members but it is wrapped up swiftly. Be it the great mass leader Shastriji or the Janta rule. The book concentrated primarily on Nehru-Gandhi family.
The book also tried its best to present the brighter side of these people. Be it defeat in 1962 or the black days of emergency, the author find something to save the grace of Mr Nehru and Ms Gandhi. Even the nepotism and dynastic hand over of power have found some way or other to be justified. If Sanjay Gandhi had been given undue power from his mother and the acts were abominable, author finds out the case of kanti bhai desai to equate. During emergency rule, when atrocities were the nature of the day for the government, quotes from foreign jpurnalists have been found criticizing the way JPN and others carried out the revolution.
the defeat of 1962 has largely been attributed to the then defence minister, the way Pt Nehru had wished it to be. Nehruvian idealism has been justified even during the time when he should have been preparing for the combat and providing armaments to the soldiers of India.
The only people the nehru indira duo have been belittled against is each other. Like Nehru’s love for democracy has been praised against the approach of indira and his lack of preparedness against china been compared against indira’s invasion of pakistan.
But what i fail to understand is if the author started the book since he feels that Indian story post-independence has not been retold, why a book which got published in 2007 had to be stopped after the incidences of 1989 election have summarily been penned down? Implementation of Mandal commission report, opening up the economy, Babri Masjid, Emergence of BJP as a political force, changing world equation making indian relation changing , tilting from erstwhile USSR towards USA have been many of the events, which could have been put in black and white by the historian. Is it only because there has been no one from ‘that’ family as PM after that?
Whatever the span chosen by the author and whatever allegiance he may have, I must praise the effort put in by the author in putting together the historical account of Indian footsteps after the birth of a nation submerged in blood of post partition hatred and marred by the continual nagging of neighbouring nation, accentuated by internal rife and riots – The piece of land, which at the upper crust seem to be a conglomerate of divided people garlanded by a common thread of passion and dedication to create the great nation.
The book certainly makes a good read as it opens many a chapters, which people like us, born so many years after the independence had little chance to know otherwise.
A friend of mine in US had asked for a book detailing india’s history and I sent this book to him. Hope he understands the history of India well and more than that the underlying feeling behind that history.